On September 30, 2016, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law two bills designed to address ongoing concern of pay inequity. A.B. 1676 amends the California Fair Pay Act by prohibiting employers from relying on an employee’s prior salary to justify a disparity between the salaries of similarly situated employees.  S.B. 1063 extends the Fair Pay Act by providing additional protections on the basis of race and ethnicity.  A.B. 1676 and S.B. 1063 are effective January 1, 2017.

The Legislature was concerned that the practice of using an applicant’s salary history as a basis for current salary unfairly affects women candidates who may have taken time out of the workforce, or who are already unfairly affected by the gender pay gap. Left unaddressed, the Legislature believes such practices will, even unintentionally, perpetuate pay disparity between men and women who perform substantially similar work.  Accordingly, under A.B. 1676, prior salary history alone is no longer sufficient to justify pay disparity between men and women who perform substantially similar work.

Along with A.B. 1676, Governor Brown signed S.B. 1063, the Wage and Equality Act of 2016. S.B. 1063 prohibits employers from paying employees of one race or ethnicity less than employees of different races or ethnicities who perform substantially similar work.  S.B. 1063 is an extension of the requirements of last year’s Fair Pay Act.

Under the Fair Pay Act, employers can no longer rely on the notion of equal pay for equal work. Instead, employees alleging pay disparity must now only show “substantially similar work when viewed as a composite of skill, effort and responsibility.”  This allows employees and the courts to compare wages of employees who perform similar work, even if the job title is different.  Likewise, comparisons are no longer limited to the “same establishment,” but rather may be a comparison at any of the employer’s locations. While the Fair Pay Act specifically addressed gender, its requirements now apply equally to race and ethnicity under S.B. 1063.

California already has stringent laws regarding equal pay. Employers should review their policies and practices to ensure compliance with the Fair Pay Act.  With the passage of A.B. 1676 and S.B. 1063, California employers must be careful in assessing employee salary.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to help employers navigate these issues.  Should you have any questions about the new law, please feel free to contact Shane R. Larsen at shane.larsen@jacksonlewis.com, Cary G. Palmer at palmerc@jacksonlewis.com, or the Jackson Lewis attorneys with whom you regularly work.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Cary G. Palmer Cary G. Palmer

Cary G. Palmer is a principal in the Sacramento, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He represents management in employment, labor and benefits law and related litigation. Cary has extensive class action experience. He also mediates class actions.

Cary practices before the state…

Cary G. Palmer is a principal in the Sacramento, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He represents management in employment, labor and benefits law and related litigation. Cary has extensive class action experience. He also mediates class actions.

Cary practices before the state and federal courts in California, the United States Department of Labor, the United States Equal Opportunity Commission, the California Civil Rights Department, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, and the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. He also defends management in statewide and nationwide class action and collective action litigation. Cary also defends management in litigation involving wrongful termination, reductions in force, discrimination, harassment, breach of contract, wage and hour, benefits, and other labor and employment-related actions. He also conducts employee and management training seminars, and provides proactive employment advice and counsel.