An employer that petitioned to compel arbitration one year after the employee filed his employment-related complaint did not waive its right to arbitrate the complaint, the California Court of Appeal has ruled, confirming the burden of proving a party waived its right to arbitration is a heavy one. Gloster v. Sonic Automotive, Inc., No. A137081 (Cal. Ct. App. May 21, 2014).

The Court found the employer consistently communicated to the employee’s counsel and the court that the dispute should be arbitrated, and the delay, in large measure, was caused by the employee’s inclusion of multiple defendants in the lawsuit. It found significant that the employer filed its petition to compel arbitration shortly after the trial court resolved issues related to the other defendants, and the employee was not prejudiced by the delay. The Court reversed the order denying arbitration.

To continue reading the full alert, click here.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Mark S. Askanas Mark S. Askanas

Mark S. Askanas is a principal in the San Francisco, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He joined the firm in 1988 and is a senior employment law litigator who has served as lead counsel for cases in state and federal courts, as…

Mark S. Askanas is a principal in the San Francisco, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He joined the firm in 1988 and is a senior employment law litigator who has served as lead counsel for cases in state and federal courts, as well as arbitration forums, throughout the western United States.

Mark practices all forms of complex litigation, including class actions and cases involving trade secrets and confidential information. He also counsels employers on all facets of employment law including, but not limited to, wage and hour issues and best preventive employment practices. He regularly speaks throughout the United States to employer groups and trade associations on these and other topics.

Photo of Mitchell F. Boomer Mitchell F. Boomer

Mitchell F. Boomer is the office managing principal in the Austin, Texas, office and a principal in the San Francisco, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Since joining the firm in 1992, he has represented employers in all areas of employment litigation, including…

Mitchell F. Boomer is the office managing principal in the Austin, Texas, office and a principal in the San Francisco, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Since joining the firm in 1992, he has represented employers in all areas of employment litigation, including wrongful termination, employment discrimination, retaliation, whistleblower, trade secret and unfair competition cases in federal and state courts in California, Washington and Nevada.

Mitch regularly advises clients on employee discipline, layoffs, reductions in force, human resource policies, leave management and disability matters. Mitch frequently addresses private industry groups on a variety of employment topics, including sexual harassment in the workplace, unfair competition, workplace violence, wage and hour law, preventive employee relations, disability and leave management, and current developments in federal and state labor and employment law.