The Ninth Circuit has recently requested the California Supreme Court to address the proper method of calculating employee commission payments to determine qualification for California’s commission salesperson exemption set forth in the Industrial Welfare Commission (“IWC”) Wage Order Nos. 4 and 7. An employee generally can qualify for this exemption if: (1) they work for
Jonathan A. Siegel
Jonathan A. Siegel is a principal in the Orange County, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He practices before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, National Labor Relations Board, state and federal agencies and courts.
Jonathan also provides advice and counsel regarding labor and employment law with respect to various issues including wage and hour law, reduction in force, WARN Act, corporate restructuring, layoffs, discipline, leave management, harassment and discrimination issues. Jonathan defends employers regarding different varieties of wrongful termination and discrimination claims.
Another California Court of Appeal Upholds Arbitration Despite NLRB’s Opinion in D.R. Horton
Another California Court of Appeal provides employers with a victory with respect to the enforcement of arbitration agreements. Affirming an order compelling arbitration in a class action for California Labor Code violations, a California Court of Appeal ruled that the employee was required to arbitrate her individual wage and hour claims against her employer because…
Positive Development: California Court of Appeal Declines to Follow NLRB Decision, D.R. Horton, and enforces Class Action Waiver in an Arbitration Agreement and Prohibits PAGA Claims
While likely subject to appeal by the plaintiff’s lawyer in the case, California employers received a welcome decision by a California Court of Appeal. The Court upheld a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement and also found the plaintiff could not bring claims under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) in light of…
New Age Discrimination Case – Sometimes a Victory is Not Always a Victory
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed summary judgment in favor of an employer in an age discrimination case. However, not all news is good news regarding the Court’s decision in Schechner v. KPIX-TV, No. 11-15294 (9th Cir. May 29,2012). The Court “clarified” that the employees could use statistical evidence to establish a…
California Court of Appeal Clarifies Personal Attendant Overtime Exemption
A good case for employers was recently issued with respect to the Personal Attendant overtime exemption. On May 14, 2012, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District held that an individual who is exempt from overtime under the Personal Attendant overtime exemption with respect to Wage Order 15 is not disqualified from the exemption …
California Employers Receive a Welcome Victory Regarding Commission Plans and the Limited Commission Exemption From Overtime
On January 24, 2012, California employers received a welcome victory regarding commission plans and the commission overtime exemption under Wage Orders 4 and 7. In Muldrow v. Surrex Solutions Corp., (CA4/1 Case No. D057955 1/24/12), the Fourth Appellate District of the Court of Appeal found that employment recruiters were eligible for the California commission…
DLSE Issues Labor Code 2810.5 Notice in 6 Languages
The California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement ("DLSE") has released the form notice that is compliant with the new California Wage Theft Prevention Act of 2011 in six (6) languages. The notices are now available in: (1) English; (2) Vietnamese; (3) Chinese; (4) Korean; (5) Spanish; and, (6) Tagalog.
Click here for the DLSE Notice to Employee in 6 languages
…
California Appeals Court Rules Law School Graduate Who Was Not Yet Admitted To Bar Was Exempt “Learned Professional”
California courts continue to build on the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision regarding the California Learned Professional Exemption. A California appellate court found a law clerk as exempt from state and federal overtime provisions who had not passed the California Bar Exam but graduated from law school. Zelasko-Barrett v. Brayton-Purcell, LLP, 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1080 (Cal.
California’s Long Arm of the Law: California Supreme Court Decides Oracle Case Against Employers Headquartered in California
California based employers who send workers from other states into California must pay the employees pursuant to California law, not the law of the state where those employees reside, according to the California Supreme Court ruling in Sullivan v. Oracle Corp. (SC S170577 6/30/11). The Supreme Court’s decision is a mixed bag of …
A Victory for Agricultural Employers: Governor Brown Vetoes the Controversial Union Election Bill SB 104
Agricultural employers received a victory when Governor Brown vetoed SB 104, the controversial bill which would have made it dramatically easier for unions to organize employers subject to the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act (“ALRA”). SB 104 was patterned, in part, after the Employee Free Choice Act which has stalled in Congress. SB 104 would …