A good case for employers was recently issued with respect to the Personal Attendant overtime exemption. On May 14, 2012, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District held that an individual who is exempt from overtime under the Personal Attendant overtime exemption with respect to Wage Order 15 is not disqualified from the exemption
Overtime
California Employers Receive a Welcome Victory Regarding Commission Plans and the Limited Commission Exemption From Overtime
On January 24, 2012, California employers received a welcome victory regarding commission plans and the commission overtime exemption under Wage Orders 4 and 7. In Muldrow v. Surrex Solutions Corp., (CA4/1 Case No. D057955 1/24/12), the Fourth Appellate District of the Court of Appeal found that employment recruiters were eligible for the California commission…
California’s Long Arm of the Law: Ninth Circuit Follows California Supreme Court to Decide Oracle Case Against Employers Headquartered in California
California-based employers who send workers from other states into California must pay the employees pursuant to California law, not the law of the state where the employees reside, according to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Sullivan v. Oracle Corp. 06-56649 (9th Cir. Dec. 13, 2011).
In Sullivan, Oracle hired “Instructors&rdquo…
California Appeals Court Rules Law School Graduate Who Was Not Yet Admitted To Bar Was Exempt “Learned Professional”
California courts continue to build on the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision regarding the California Learned Professional Exemption. A California appellate court found a law clerk as exempt from state and federal overtime provisions who had not passed the California Bar Exam but graduated from law school. Zelasko-Barrett v. Brayton-Purcell, LLP, 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1080 (Cal.
New Case Provides More Flexibility for Employers Crafting Commission Plans
In a recent pro-employer decision, the California Court of Appeals held that California’s exemption from overtime requirements for commissioned employees applied to a car sales consultant and the decision provided flexibility for employers when crafting commission plans. Areso v. Carmax, Inc., 195 Cal. App. 4th 996 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2011). In Areso, the …
California’s Long Arm of the Law: California Supreme Court Decides Oracle Case Against Employers Headquartered in California
California based employers who send workers from other states into California must pay the employees pursuant to California law, not the law of the state where those employees reside, according to the California Supreme Court ruling in Sullivan v. Oracle Corp. (SC S170577 6/30/11). The Supreme Court’s decision is a mixed bag of …
The Ninth Circuit Has Revitalized The California Learned Professional Overtime Exemption and Remanded To A Jury Key Issues Under The Administrative Exemption
In 2009, companies who classified certain unlicensed accountants, engineers and other professions as exempt from overtime under the California Learned Professional Exemption were dealt a broadside by a federal District Court when it held that unlicensed accountants were categorically ineligible for the Learned Professional Exemption. The decision lead to numerous employers revaluating the Learned Professional…