For employers with California employees, there seems to be no way to avoid California’s complicated and protective employment laws, and things just got a bit more complicated.

On September 25, 2016, Governor Brown signed into law SB 1241, which prohibits employers from requiring California employees to litigate or arbitrate employment disputes outside of California or under the laws of another state.

SB 1241 applies to any contract entered into, modified, or extended on or after January 1, 2017. The new law prohibits so called “choice of law” and “forum selection” clauses that require employees who live and work in California to bring their employment claims in jurisdictions other than California or under the laws of another state.  Any provisions of a contract that contain prohibited choice of law and forum selection clauses are voidable by an employee, meaning that the dispute will be decided in California under California law.  The law also provides that the court can award the employee attorney’s fees, in addition to an injunction, when an employee successfully challenges the prohibited choice of law and forum selection clauses.

Key Limitations of SB 1241

Despite its broad impact, the law is subject to a number of key limitations.

  1. It does not apply to existing contracts unless they are modified or extended on or after January 1, 2017.
  2. It only applies to employees who “primarily” reside and work in California.
  3. Therefore, non-California choice of law and forum selection clauses may be permissible for employees who primarily reside outside of California even though they do work in California.
  4. It only applies when agreement to the choice of law and forum selection clauses are a “condition of employment.”
  5. Although the law is not clear, presumably contracts dealing with ancillary issues such as job benefits, bonus programs, etc., may not be covered.
  6. Only the choice of law and forum selection provisions, not the entire contract, are voidable.
  7. The law does not apply to contracts where the employee is individually represented by an attorney in negotiating the terms of the agreement.

Best Practices for Employers

Employers should review their employee agreements to determine if they require, as a condition of employment, choice of law and forum selection clauses, which are prohibited by the new law. If so, employers should modify those agreements to provide an express exemption for California employees with respect to the choice of law and forum selection clauses and ensure that the remaining portions of the agreements are consistent with California law.

Jackson Lewis attorneys are available to help employers navigate these issues.  Should you have any questions about the new law, please feel free to contact Sander van der Heide at sander.vdheide@jacksonlewis.com, Dale R. Kuykendall at Kuykendd@jacksonlewis.com, or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dale R. Kuykendall Dale R. Kuykendall

Dale R. Kuykendall is a principal and the office litigation manager for the Sacramento, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. His practice focuses on advising and counseling employers in the hiring, supervision and termination of employees.

In addition to his advice and counsel…

Dale R. Kuykendall is a principal and the office litigation manager for the Sacramento, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. His practice focuses on advising and counseling employers in the hiring, supervision and termination of employees.

In addition to his advice and counsel practice, Dale has successfully litigated a wide variety of employment cases through trial, including claims of unfair competition, breach of contract, discrimination, harassment and wrongful termination.