A clause delegating to an arbitrator the authority to decide questions of an arbitration agreement’s enforceability was not unconscionable under California law, the California Court of Appeal has ruled. Malone v. Superior Court, No. B253891 (Cal. Ct. App. June 17, 2014). The Court affirmed an order enforcing the delegation clause and compelling arbitration. Significantly,
Legal Articles
Protected Speech Does Not Include Extortion, California Appellate Court Rules
Be cautious with the employee who “doth protest too much.” The law protects whistleblowers. Employers must be careful to avoid retaliating against employees who report good faith concerns, even when such concerns prove meritless. But this does not leave employees free to blackmail employers by threatening to makes claims unless the employer capitulates to settlement demands. In Stenehjem v. Sareen, a California Court of Appeal allowed an employer to pursue a counter-claim for extortion where its employee allegedly sent an email threatening to report it to the U.S. Attorney and file a federal False Claims Act action unless it settled the employee’s defamation lawsuit. The Court also rejected the employee’s claim that his threat constituted protected speech under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. While Stenehjem presents a welcome development for California employers, its core allegations do not arise often. Employers should thus review situations closely with counsel before leaping to the conclusion that an employee’s “threat” to report concerns amounts to extortion.
Continue Reading Protected Speech Does Not Include Extortion, California Appellate Court Rules
The “Dog Ate My Affirmative Action Plan” and Other Bad Excuses for Not Getting the Job Done
In a welcome common sense decision, the California Court of Appeal in Serri v. Santa Clara University affirmed summary judgment granted to Santa Clara University against its former Director of Affirmative Action.
Why? Because as the University’s Director of Affirmative Action, she failed to file the University’s Affirmative Action Plan (AAP) for three years in…
An Employer’s Guide to California’s Heat Illness Prevention Regulations
As the days grow warmer, California employers with outdoor places of employment should think about compliance with California’s Heat Illness Prevention Regulations (Cal. Code of Regs. tit. 8, § 3395). To comply with the regulations, California employers should take four essential steps:
- Develop and implement written procedures for addressing heat illness prevention;
- Train employees and
…
Settlement Agreements May Trap the Unwary Employer for Court Costs, California Court Instructs
Ambiguity in settlement agreements can sabotage finality and certainty as a recent California decision shows. Where a settlement agreement is silent regarding litigation costs, an employee may obtain mandatory costs as the prevailing party under state law as the settlement proceeds constituted the required “net monetary recovery,” the California Court of Appeal has ruled. DeSaulles …
10 Rules of Startup Employment Labor Law
Originally posted by SmartRecruiters Blog, the leading source for how to hire on the web. To view the original post, please click here.
So you’re a startup. You’ve decided to take your world-changing idea and move it out of your dorm room/garage/favorite-table-at-Starbucks and start a legitimate business. So what next?
If you plan on
…
Fitness-for-Duty Exam Permitted under Federal FMLA after Employee Restored to Job, California Court Rules
An employer did not violate the federal Family and Medical Leave Act by requiring an employee to undergo a fitness-for-duty evaluation after it had restored her to her position following a medical leave of absence for psychological issues, the California Court of Appeal has ruled. White v. County of Los Angeles, No. B243471 (Cal.…
Supervisor’s Conduct Supported Same-Sex Harassment Claim, California Court Rules
Finding an intern had produced sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude his supervisor engaged in a pervasive pattern of harassing conduct “because of sex,” including numerous gifts, frequent lunch purchases, along with sexual jokes and displays of pornographic computer images, the California Court of Appeal has allowed his harassment suit to proceed, reversing…
San Francisco implements ‘ban the box’ legislation
San Francisco has joined the growing numbers of cities and states around the country implementing “ban the box” legislation which restricts inquiries regarding an applicant’s criminal records on applications for employment and during job interviews. The EEOC recommends “banning the box” in line with its guidance regarding convictions and consideration in use of information based…
Organ Donor’s Association-Disability Discrimination Claim Can Proceed, California Court Rules
Timing is not everything. In Rope v. Auto-Chlor of Washington System of Washington, Inc., the employer fired an employee for purported performance reasons on December 30, 2010 – two days before California’s Michelle Malkin Donor Protection Act became effective. The timing was significant because when the employee was hired in October of 2010, he…